In partnership with
Apple’s Starlink Update Sparks Huge Earning Opportunity
Apple just secretly added Starlink satellite support to iPhones through iOS 18.3.
One of the biggest potential winners? Mode Mobile.
Mode’s EarnPhone already reaches 490M+ users that have earned over $1B, and that’s before global satellite coverage. With SpaceX eliminating "dead zones," Mode's earning technology can now reach billions more in unbanked and rural populations worldwide.
Their global expansion is perfectly timed, and investors like you still have a chance to invest in their pre-IPO offering at $0.52/share.
With their recent 32,481% revenue growth and newly reserved Nasdaq ticker, Mode is one step closer to a potential IPO.
Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering.
Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
Last Sunday was Mother's Day. To every mother reading this, and to every reader who has thanked a mother for the financial education she provided, I hope the day was filled with the people you love. The brunches and the flowers are wonderful. They are also, in the most institutional reading of the holiday I can offer you, a small reminder of something much larger.
We are in the middle of the largest generational wealth transfer in human history. Estimates from Cerulli Associates and other research firms put the figure at roughly 84 trillion dollars passing from baby boomers to their heirs over the next two decades, with the bulk of it concentrated in the next ten to fifteen years. To put that figure in context, it is more than the total annual GDP of the United States and the European Union combined. It is the dominant single financial event of our generation.
And almost no one is having the conversations that would let them navigate it well.
I want to spend today talking about that. Not about market structure or Fed policy or earnings cycles, although we will return to those topics later this week. Today is about the family balance sheet, the conversations that protect it, and the practical framework for handling generational wealth transfer with the same institutional discipline you would apply to your portfolio.
THE PROBLEM EVERY FAMILY HAS AND ALMOST NO ONE DISCUSSES
Here is the data point that should stop you in your tracks. According to multiple studies over the last decade, roughly 70 percent of generational wealth transfers fail. Not in the sense that the money disappears overnight. In the sense that within two generations, the wealth that took a lifetime to accumulate has been substantially or entirely depleted by the heirs.
Why. The standard answers are bad investment decisions, lifestyle inflation, or family disputes. Those are surface symptoms. The underlying cause, in nearly every documented case, is a failure of communication. The wealth holders did not have the conversations they needed to have, in the order they needed to have them, before the transition was forced on the family by death or incapacity.
This is not a comfortable subject. Mother's Day or otherwise, talking with your parents about their financial plans, or talking with your children about yours, ranks alongside dental work as activities people will cheerfully postpone indefinitely. The American cultural script around money is that it is impolite to discuss in detail with family members. The institutional script is exactly the opposite. The families that successfully preserve wealth across generations talk about it constantly, openly, and with discipline.
Today's piece is a framework for those conversations. It will not replace a qualified estate attorney. It will not replace a CPA who specializes in trust structures. What it will do is give you the agenda for the meetings that need to happen before any professionals are engaged, so that when you do hire them, you are using their time efficiently rather than paying them to mediate basic family disagreements that should have been resolved at the kitchen table years earlier.
THE FIVE CONVERSATIONS
These conversations should happen in this order. Skipping ahead causes problems that are difficult to unwind later.
CONVERSATION ONE. THE INVENTORY CONVERSATION
The first conversation is purely informational and the simplest one to start. It is a comprehensive inventory of what exists. Real estate, retirement accounts, brokerage accounts, life insurance policies, business interests, defined benefit pension entitlements, Social Security expectations, digital assets, collectibles, and yes, debts.
Most families discover during this conversation that no single member of the family has a complete picture. The matriarch knows about the bank accounts. The patriarch knows about the brokerage accounts. Neither one has thought about the old 401(k) from a job ended in 1998 that is still sitting somewhere. The life insurance policy from the second job is in a drawer no one has opened in a decade. The cottage that was deeded into a family trust in 1987 was structurally amended in 2003 and no one remembers exactly how.
The inventory conversation is uncomfortable for a different reason. It forces wealth holders to acknowledge in writing what they own, and many find that exercise emotionally complicated. Some realize they have less than they thought. Some realize they have more than they have ever discussed. Either revelation can be jarring.
The institutional discipline is to do the inventory in writing, store it in a secure but accessible location, and update it annually on a fixed date. Many families use the week between Christmas and New Year for this annual review. The exact timing matters less than the fact that there is one.
A practical tool for the aggregation phase is Empower's free dashboard, which can pull in account balances across most major institutions and give you a single net worth picture. It is not a substitute for the full estate inventory, but it is a useful starting point that takes 30 minutes to set up and updates automatically thereafter.
CONVERSATION TWO. THE INTENT CONVERSATION
Once the inventory exists, the second conversation is about intent. What does the family want to happen with these assets, in what order, under what circumstances, and why.
This is the conversation that most families dread and most often skip. It involves explicit discussion of priorities. Should the family vacation home stay in the family or be sold and the proceeds divided. Should an inheritance be equal across children, or should it adjust for differential needs and contributions. Should there be charitable giving, and if so, in what amount and to which causes.
There are no objectively correct answers to these questions. What matters is that they are discussed before the conditions for activating the answers exist, so that the wishes of the wealth holders are documented and understood while they are still alive to clarify and revise them.
A useful framing for the intent conversation is to separate the financial assets from the meaningful assets. Financial assets are fungible. The grandfather clock is not. The wedding ring that was passed down for four generations is not. Conversations about the meaningful assets are often more emotional than the conversations about the dollar amounts, and they need to be handled with the same care.
The institutional discipline is to write the intent down, in plain language, signed and dated by the wealth holders. This is not yet a will. It is a memorandum of intent that the eventual estate attorneys will use as a starting point for the formal documents.
CONVERSATION THREE. THE STRUCTURE CONVERSATION
The third conversation moves from intent to mechanism. Given what the family wants to happen, what legal and financial structures actually deliver that outcome with the lowest friction, the lowest tax burden, and the lowest risk of family conflict.
This is where the professionals enter the picture. A qualified estate planning attorney, a CPA who specializes in transfer taxation, and possibly a financial planner with credentials in legacy planning. The reason these professionals come in third rather than first is that their hourly rates are high, and using them to figure out what the family wants is enormously inefficient. By the time you engage them, the inventory and intent should already be documented. Their job is to translate.
Common structures include revocable living trusts, irrevocable trusts for specific purposes, life insurance trusts, charitable remainder trusts, family limited partnerships, and a range of more specialized vehicles. Each has tradeoffs in flexibility, control, tax treatment, and complexity. The right structure depends on the size of the estate, the composition of the assets, the family circumstances, and the jurisdictions involved.
What I would caution against is the impulse to over engineer. Some families with relatively simple estates get talked into byzantine structures because the professional advising them has an incentive to recommend complexity. A good professional will recommend the simplest structure that accomplishes the family's goals. If you are getting recommendations that you cannot understand after a thorough explanation, get a second opinion.
CONVERSATION FOUR. THE STEWARDSHIP CONVERSATION
The fourth conversation is the one that most directly addresses the 70 percent failure rate. It is the conversation about how the inheritors will manage the wealth once it transfers to them.
This conversation needs to happen in two parts. First, the inheritors need to understand the wealth holder's philosophy. What were the principles that allowed this wealth to be accumulated. What are the values around spending, saving, charitable giving, and risk taking that the wealth holder hopes will continue. This is not a lecture. It is a transmission of operating philosophy.
Second, the inheritors need to be educated on the practical mechanics. How does a brokerage account actually work. What is the difference between a Roth and a traditional retirement account. How does compounding interact with tax efficiency. What is the difference between a dividend and a capital gain, and why does it matter for after tax returns.
Many wealth holders skip this part because they assume their children, who are competent professionals in their own fields, must have absorbed financial literacy somewhere along the way. They almost always have not. The American educational system does not teach personal finance with any rigor. The financial services industry has commercial interests in keeping the public partially educated. Even adult inheritors with graduate degrees and successful careers are often surprisingly underprepared for managing significant assets.
The stewardship conversation should be ongoing rather than a one time event. Many families institute a quarterly or semi annual family financial meeting, where the wealth holder walks the next generation through the current state of the assets, the decisions being considered, and the reasoning behind them. This is enormously time consuming. It is also the single most effective predictor of successful generational transfer in the academic literature.
For families who want to streamline this education, automated tools can help. M1 Finance lets you create custodial pies that adult children can monitor and learn from before they are managing significant capital of their own. It is a useful sandbox for transmission of investment philosophy.
CONVERSATION FIVE. THE CONTINGENCY CONVERSATION
The fifth conversation is about what happens if things do not go according to plan. Incapacitation. Cognitive decline. The death of a spouse before the wealth holder. Divorce of an inheritor. Bankruptcy of a family business. Estrangement.
These topics are deeply uncomfortable, which is why they are routinely deferred until they are too painful to address. The institutional discipline is to address them while they remain hypothetical. The documents that need to be in place include durable powers of attorney, healthcare directives, designated successor trustees, and explicit guidance for trustees about how to handle predictable family conflicts.
A specific recommendation. Every wealth holder should have a written ethical will, sometimes called a legacy letter, alongside the legal will. The ethical will is a personal document that captures the values, the family stories, the lessons learned, and the wishes for how the family operates after the wealth holder is gone. It has no legal force. It has enormous emotional and operational force. Inheritors who have an ethical will from their parents make better decisions, faster, with less family conflict, in the months following a death. The cost to produce one is a few hours and the cost of not having one can be a permanent fracture in family relationships.
THE BROADER POINT
The 84 trillion dollar wealth transfer is not just a statistic. It is happening in millions of families simultaneously, and most of them are not having the conversations that would let them navigate it well. The market for estate attorneys, family office services, and high end financial planners is booming for exactly this reason. The industry has correctly diagnosed that families need help. What the industry sells, however, is mostly the structure conversation. It cannot sell you the inventory, intent, stewardship, and contingency conversations. Those have to happen at the family level.
The good news is that any family can have those conversations. They do not require wealth at any particular threshold. The difference between a family with 200,000 dollars in assets and a family with 20 million dollars in assets is the complexity of the structure conversation. The other four conversations are functionally identical. Inventory, intent, stewardship, and contingency are universal.
If your family has not had these conversations, the week after Mother's Day is a reasonable time to start. The emotional context of having just celebrated a generational figure in the family creates a window where the topic is less awkward than it would be on a random Tuesday in October. Many wealth holders are actually relieved to have the conversation initiated by an adult child, because they have been wanting to talk about these things and have not known how to bring them up.
A practical opening. Send a short note. Say something like, I have been thinking about how grateful I am for everything you have built, and I want to make sure that when the time comes, I do justice to it. Could we set up a few hours over the next month to talk about how you would like things to work. Most parents respond positively to that framing. It positions the conversation as gratitude and stewardship, not as inheritance hunting.
THE IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
This week, take one of the following actions, depending on which side of the transfer you are on.
If you are the wealth holder, set a date in the next 60 days for a family meeting and put it on the calendar. Begin assembling the inventory. Use a simple spreadsheet or a tool like Empower to aggregate what you can.
If you are an inheritor or expecting to be one, send the note above to your parents this week. Do not push for an immediate meeting. Plant the seed and let them set the timing.
In either case, identify the qualified professionals you will eventually engage. An estate attorney with at least 10 years of specialized practice. A CPA who handles trust returns regularly. A fee only financial planner with no commission incentives. Get the names now. Do not wait until you need them urgently.
Finally, write your own ethical will. Set aside two hours, sit with a notebook, and draft the document you wish your parents had written for you. The exercise will clarify your own values. The document will eventually serve your own children. The two hours you spend on it this week may be the most consequential financial planning work you do all year.
ONE LAST THOUGHT
This newsletter usually runs on the language of strategy, allocation, and discipline. Today's piece runs on the language of family. They are the same thing.
The institutional families that have preserved wealth across generations are not smarter than other families. They do not have better investments. They do not have access to information that you cannot also obtain. What they have is the discipline to talk about uncomfortable things, in writing, on a schedule, with the same rigor they apply to their portfolios.
Mother's Day was last weekend. The conversations that protect what your family has built are this week, and next week, and every quarter for the rest of your lives.
To every mother who taught a child about money, thank you. To every reader who is now in a position to teach the next generation, the work begins now.
Reply with the keyword LEGACY and I will send you the Family Wealth Conversation Workbook, a printable five page guide with the specific questions to ask in each of the five conversations above. It is the same workbook I provide to private clients beginning their generational planning, formatted so that any family can use it regardless of asset level.
Until Wednesday, stay strategic.
Taylor Voss
Money Systems Lab
What does that $70k hire really cost?
Salary is only part of the equation. Local taxes, benefits, and employment costs add up quickly.
Use Oyster’s calculator to estimate the real cost of hiring globally, in seconds.